Why every "global penis size map" you've seen is probably wrong, racist, or both
Before we dive in, you need to know that nearly every "penis size by country" study is deeply flawed. We're going to show you the data that exists, then explain why it's mostly garbage. The racist history of these measurements, the terrible methodology, and why you should be extremely skeptical of any country rankings you see online.
Here's what various studies claim about average erect penis size by country. Remember: these numbers come from different studies with wildly different methodologies, sample sizes, and measurement techniques.
| Rank | Country | Reported Average (inches) | Study Problems |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇸🇩 Sudan | 6.48" | Self-reported, sample of 28 men |
| 2 | 🇪🇨 Ecuador | 6.47" | Website survey, unverified |
| 3 | 🇨🇩 Congo | 6.45" | No actual study found |
| 4 | 🇬🇭 Ghana | 6.42" | 115 subjects, selection bias |
| 5 | 🇨🇴 Colombia | 6.41" | Self-measured |
| 15 | 🇫🇷 France | 6.20" | Condom company data |
| 25 | 🇺🇸 United States | 5.57" | Mixed studies, varies by source |
| 35 | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | 5.49" | NHS data, clinical measurement |
| 45 | 🇯🇵 Japan | 5.20" | Tenga company survey |
| 55 | 🇨🇳 China | 5.08" | Hospital data, regional only |
| 65 | 🇮🇳 India | 4.94" | Single city study, 500 men |
| 75 | 🇰🇷 South Korea | 4.80" | Military conscript data |
The obsession with measuring penis size by race and nationality has deeply racist roots. Colonial-era "scientists" used fabricated genital measurements to justify racist hierarchies:
European colonizers spread myths about African men having larger penises to portray them as "hypersexual" and "animalistic" - justifying slavery and oppression. These stereotypes persist in modern data collection.
Western researchers often published "studies" claiming Asian men were smaller to reinforce ideas of Western superiority and Asian "femininity." Many modern studies still reflect this bias.
The most comprehensive review of 20 studies with 15,521 professionally measured men found:
Studies done in cold clinical settings vs. warm environments show differences of up to 1.5 inches. Guess which countries have warmer measurement rooms?
Korean and Japanese studies often include 18-19 year olds still developing. African studies tend to measure men 25-35. This alone accounts for significant differences.
In countries where penis size is culturally emphasized (certain African and Latin American nations), confident men volunteer. In conservative cultures, only those needing medical help participate.
Bone-pressed adds 0.5-1.5 inches. Some studies measure from the side, others from top. Some use stretched flaccid length and multiply by 1.3. It's a mess.
Ironically, countries stereotyped as "largest" search most frequently about size, suggesting anxiety exists everywhere regardless of supposed "national average."
| Search Rank | Country | Searches per 100k | Supposed Size Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇿🇦 South Africa | 847 | #8 "largest" |
| 2 | 🇬🇭 Ghana | 782 | #4 "largest" |
| 3 | 🇸🇬 Singapore | 743 | #68 "smallest" |
| 4 | 🇺🇸 United States | 698 | #25 "average" |
| 5 | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | 654 | #35 "average" |
Men everywhere worry about the same thing. The country you're born in doesn't determine your size, and these "national averages" say more about bad science and cultural biases than biological reality.
There is no credible scientific evidence that penis size varies significantly by country or ethnicity. The maps and rankings you see online are based on a toxic mix of bad science, racist stereotypes, self-reported data, and outright fabrications.
When studies use proper methodology - medical measurement, adequate sample sizes, standardized techniques - the supposed differences between countries disappear. The variation within any population is far greater than any imagined variation between populations.
Your country doesn't determine your size. Use our calculator based on actual medical data, not racist pseudoscience and internet myths.
Use Scientific Calculator →